2007 Peer-Reviewed Articles

Brossard, D. & Nisbet, M. C. (2007). Deference to scientific authority among a low information public: Understanding U.S. opinion on agricultural biotechnology. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(1), 24-52. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edl003

Brossard, D. & Shanahan, J. (2007). Perspectives on communication about agricultural biotechnology. In D. Brossard, J. Shanahan, & T. C. Nesbitt (Eds.), The public, the media, and agricultural biotechnology (pp. 3-20). Cambridge, MA: CAB International. doi: 10.1079/9781845932046.0003

Brossard, D., Shanahan, J., & Nesbitt, T. C. (Eds.). (2007). The public, the media, and agricultural biotechnology. Cambridge, MA: CAB International. doi: 10.1079/9781845932046.0000

Nisbet, M. C. & Scheufele, D. A. (2007). The future of public engagementThe Scientist, 21(10), 38-44.

Scheufele, D. A., Corley, E. A., Dunwoody, S., Shih, T.-J., Hillback, E., & Guston, D. H. (2007). Scientists worry about some risks more than the public. Nature Nanotechnology, 2(12), 732-734. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.392

Scheufele, D. A. (2007). Nano doesn’t have a marketing problem… yet. Nano Today, 2(5), 48. doi: 10.1016/S1748-0132(07)70159-7

Scheufele, D. A. (2007). Opinion climates, spirals of silence and biotechnology: Public opinion as a heuristic for scientific decision-making. In D. Brossard, J. Shanahan, & T. C. Nesbitt (Eds.), The public, the media, and agricultural biotechnology (pp. 231-241). Cambridge, MA: CAB International. doi: 10.1079/9781845932046.0231