December
- Vermelho, “Ruins para a ciência:” revista cientifica bane comentários, December 31, 2013
- Huffington Post, Word of the year — Science: Fact vs. fiction, December 31, 2013
- Contra Costa Times, Mean-spirited online comments have negative impact on science, December 14, 2013
- Corriere della Sera, Perché siamo tutti troll: Modeste proposte per autoregolamentare i forconisti del web, December 13, 2013
November
- TheStar.com Canada, Mainstreaming of mean: Our age of nastiness, deceit and malice, November 17, 2013
- Grow, Communicating science in the digital age, Fall 2013 issue
October
- The Daily Circuit, Minnesota Public Radio, Are online comments “bad for science?” October 30, 2013
- PanSci.tw,如果泛科學關閉了評論功能, October 30, 2013
- Philly.com, Trolls disrupt the message and discourse, October 26, 2013
- The New Yorker, The psychology of online comments, October 24, 2013
- Guokr, 如果果壳网关闭了评论功能, October 24, 2013
- Truth Dig, Why did Popular Science can its comments section? October 17, 2013
- Digital Trends, Can Facebook cure the Internet of comment section trolls-and if so, should it? October 16, 2013
- New Hampshire Public Radio, Why Popular Science put the kibosh on online comments, October 9, 2013
- The Martha’s Vineyard Times, At large: Just a quick comment, October 9, 2013
- Chicago Tribune, We need an Xprize for online reviews and comments, October 9, 2013
- GalileoNet.it, Scienza: è giusto censurare i commenti online? October 5, 2013
- Norran, Tack alla ni läsare i Danmark, October 2, 2013
- South China Morning Post, Closure of Popular Science’s online comment stream sparks debate, October 2, 2013
- Zeit Online, Kein Kommentar, October 2, 2013
- Observatório da Imprensa, Site de jornalismo científico proíbe comentários de leitores, October 1, 2013
September
- Journalist’s Resource, What’s new in digital scholarship: September 2013
- inoCMИ.ru, Почему PopularScience.com закрывает раздел комментариев, September 30, 2013
- Nieman Journalism Lab, What’s new in digital scholarship: The research on making comments better and American media exceptionalism, September 30, 2012
- News and Tech, PopSci nixes comments, September 30, 2013
- The New York Times, Comment ban sets off debate, September 30, 2013
- The Windsor Star, Popular Science purges the boors, September 28, 2013
- Ottawa Citizen, Popular Science ends on line comments because they ‘undermine’ scientific understanding, September 27, 2013
- Gizmodo.fr, Popular Science ferme ses commentaires, et ouvre un épineux débat, September 27, 2013
- Tucson Weekly, The gaping maw of the Internet drove “Popular Science” to shut down comments section entirely, September 27, 2013
- Agence Science Presse, Comment combattre les trolls en science, September 26, 2013
- The Gazette, Popular Science declares its independence from Commentistan, September 26, 2013
- The Escapist, Popular Science: Comments can be bad for science, September 25, 2013
- WND, Popular Science kills comments, September 25, 2013
- The Rush Limbaugh Show, Popular science ends reader comments because too many people disagree with them, September 25, 2013
-
ABC.es, La UIMP debate en un seminario los nuevos retos de la divulgación científica, September 24, 2013
- GeekOSystem.com, Popular Science is shutting down its comments section because comments are bad for science, September 24, 2013
- FrenchTribune.com, PopSci shuts down public comments on scientific topics, September 25, 2013
- stuff.co.nz, Online comments called bad for science, September 25, 2013
- TechEYE.net, Popular Science switches off trolls, September 25, 2013
- Headlines & Global News, Popular Science shuts down comments section because trolls could start chain reaction that influences research funding, September 25, 2013
- Wired, Popular Science has the good sense to shut off their anti-science comment system, September 24, 2013
- Daily Tech, PopSci kills comments, blames global warming, evolution, September 24, 2013
- The Guardian, Popular Science kills comments while YouTube tries to fix them, September 25, 2013
- PopularScience.com, Why we’re shutting off our comments, September 24, 2013
- All Tech Considered (NPR), ‘Popular Science’ shuts comments, citing Internet ‘trolls,’ September 24, 2013
- CNET, Popular Science silences its comments section, September 24, 2013
August
- Wisconsin Natural Resources Magazine, Bringing our science to the people, August 2013
- Huffington Post, Facebook wars erupt over Colorado teen’s killing, August 22, 2013
- Ars Technica, Online media and science make for awkward partners, August 19, 2013
- The Malay Mail online, One good review deserves another, August 11, 2013
- Journalism.co.uk, Why negative comments are like broken windows, August 7, 2013
July
- CNN Mexico, ¿Qué hacer con esos ‘trolls’ que arruinan el diálogo en internet? July 24, 2013
- CNN.com, Internet trolls: What to do about the scourge of the web? July 11, 2013
- The Scientist, Tweeting to the top, July 2, 2013
JUNE
- The Guardian, Nanotechnology and religion: a complex relationship, June 12, 2013
April
- The Guardian, The power of ‘you’? Science policy below the line, April 17, 2013
- The Commentator, This Editorial is Garbage, April 17, 2013
- The Cornell Daily Sun, Environmental issues: Let’s talk them out, April 15, 2013
- The New York Times’ Dot Earth Blog, Climate campaigners try flooding the (comment) zones, April 8, 2013
- The Anniston Star, Bob Davis: Voices of the digital masses, April 7, 2013
- Editor & Publisher, Digital publishing: Hosting the screaming masses, April 3, 2013
- Inside Climate News, Climate hawks go on offense against skeptics, but impact uncertain, April 2, 2013
- Mother Jones, This article sucks: The science of why you should never read web comments, March/April issue (print edition)
March
- Huffington Post, The Frankenstein’s Monster of social media, March 29, 2013
- futurezone.at, Trolle sind Meinungsmacher im Netz, March 28, 2013
- WHYY-FM, Radio Times with Marty Moss-Coane, Online comments, March 25, 2013
- NPR, How Ellen DeGeneres helped change the conversation about gays, March 25, 2013
- Journal of Young Investigators, Online “trolls” make readers sour toward science, March 22, 2013
- Time Magazine, No comment, March 18, 2013
- CBC News, Are ‘internet trolls’ wielding more influence than scientists?, March 18, 2013
- The Daily Cardinal, Professor profile: Dietram Scheufele, on science and society, March 18, 2013
- Daily Kos, The effect of uncivil comments, March 18, 2013
- KSJ Tracker, Researchers ask if neuroscientists prefer traditional journalism to blogging. Controversy ensues. March 15, 2013
- The Wages of Wins Journal, The Wages of Wins comment policy: This is our house!, March 14, 2013
- The Malaysian Insider, The ‘nasty effect’: Readers’ comments change our perception of news, March 13, 2013
- Badger Herald, Ron Johnson begins fundraising for re-election, March 13, 2013
- omg! from Yahoo! South Africa, The ‘Nasty Effect’: Readers’ comments change our perception of news, March 13, 2013
- Semiconductor Manufacturing & Design Community, High-tech PR insights, March 12, 2013
- ScienceNews, When trolls come out from under their bridges, it’s bad news for scientific discourse, March 12, 2013
- El País, “Menuda estupidez de artículo”, o cómo los comentarios de Internet moldean las opiniones, March 12, 2013
- KOSU, The “Nasty Effect’: How comments color perception, March 12, 2013
- National Public Radio, The ‘Nasty Effect’: How comments color comprehension, March 11, 2013
- New Hampshire Public Radio, Beware the nasty effect, March 11, 2013
- Phys.org, Small differences in how a technology is defined can make a big difference in how the public feels about it, March 11, 2013
- Digital Trends, Negative user comments can sway readers’ reaction to news, read at your own risk, March 11, 2013
- The Cap Times, Paul Fanlund: Do ugly online reader comments really matter?, March 11, 2013
- O Estado de S. Paulo, O efeito da baixaria, March 10, 2013 (em português)
- New Zealand Listener, Goldmine or gutter? The debate over online comments, March 9, 2013
- Nanowerk News, Nanotechnology General News, March 9, 2013
- University Communications, UW-Madison, Small differences in how a technology is defined can make a big differences in how the public feels about it, March 8, 2013
- News & Views, Post Mortem, March 8, 2013
- Los Angeles Times, Daum: Online’s “nasty effect”, March 7, 2013
- The Straits Times, The net effect of mischief makers, March 7, 2013
- WORT-FM, Psychology and Technology, March 4, 2013
- Q.E.D., Breeding civility with civility, March 3, 2013
- Le Nouvel Observateur, Commentaires sur les sites web : n’ayons pas peur des trolls, March 3, 2013 (en français)
- Gawker, How Nasty Comments Can Change the Way We Think, March 3, 2013
- PCmag, Study: Rude Web Comments Can Polarize Readers’ Perceptions, March 3, 2013
- New York Times, This Story Stinks, March 3, 2013
February
- Radio Canada, It is better in the morning, The troll phenomena on the Internet, February 20, 2013 (en français)
- Kijk Magazine, Botte sitereacties polariseren discussie, February 20, 2013
- Haaretz, הכתבות איך הטרולים של הטוקבקים משפיעים על, February 19, 2013 (בעברית)
- Agence Science-Presse, Communiquer la science, mais comment?, February 19, 2013 (en français)
- LiveScience, Trolls’ Online Comments Skew Perception of Science, February 19, 2013
- Smithsonian Magazine, Trolls Are Ruining Science Journalism, February 18, 2013
- Phys.org, Trolls win: Rude blog comments dim the allure of science online, February 14, 2013
- Le Monde, Comment les “trolls” radicalisent l’esprit des lecteurs sur Internet, February 14, 2013 (en français)
- The Chronicle of Higher Education, How Rude! Reader Comments May Undermine Scientists’ Authority, February 14, 2013
- The Telegraph, Online comments ‘undermine scientific research’, February 13, 2013
- Agence Science Presse, Science: s’insérer dans la conversation, February 13, 2013 (en français)
- Portage Daily Register, NICHOLS COLUMN: Those ugly online comments have impact, February 12, 2013
- memeburn, 10 things the comments section has taught me about the web, February 8, 2013
- NPR’s Science Friday, Preserving Science News in an Online World, February 1, 2013 (transcript here)
January
- Minnesota Public Radio, The future of comments, January 29, 2013
- Scientific American Blogs: A Blog Around the Clock, Commenting threads: good, bad, or not at all., January 28, 2013
- Scientific American Blogs: Doing Good Science, Academic tone-trolling: How does interactivity impact online science communication?, January 28, 2013
- Huffington Post, Scientists Prove That Internet Trolls Are Wicked, January 25, 2013
- USA Today, Television science trails history of disappointment, January 12, 2013
- FastCompany, How online trolls are ruining science news, January 11, 2013
- The Independent, The science: Why trolling is bad for our understanding of complex issues, January 11, 2013
- The Pod Delusion, January 11, 2013
- The A.V. Club, The Disclaimer: Art, more art, and dumb online comments, January 10, 2013
- New Statesman, Why you shouldn’t read comments, January 9, 2013
- Mother Jones, The Science of Why Comment Trolls Suck, January 9, 2013
- SciDev.net, Internet is ‘valuable science resource but can bias discourse’, January 8, 2013
- FastCompany, How Blog Comments, Google Autocomplete Reinforce Scientific Bias, January 8, 2013
- Lab Manager Magazine, Researchers: Online science news needs careful study, January 6, 2013
- Chicagoist, Online comments hurt science understanding, January 5, 2013
- Poynter., Researchers: Online commenters impair readers’ scientific literacy, January 4, 2013
- A.V. Club, Awful online comments hurt understanding of news, reports local news site filled with awful online comments, January 4, 2013
- Newsroom America, Internet fraught with unintended consequences for science news, find researchers, January 4, 2013
- Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Online comments hurt science understanding, study finds, January 4, 2013
- etcétera, La comunicación científica no entiende a la red, January 4, 2013
- ScienceDaily, Online Science News With User Comments Fraught With Unintended Consequences, Study Suggests, January 3, 2013
- Materia, La ciencia naufraga en la red, January 3, 2013