2023
- 15-Aug-23: During pandemic, proponents of ‘doing your own research’ believed more COVID misinformation
- 7-Jul-23: Art that integrates data visualizations can help bridge the US political divide over climate change
2021
- 2-Sep-21: Can the ‘Flatten the Curve’ Infographic Change Social Distancing Behavior?; The Story Behind the Research
- 21-Jul-21: Researchers and Public Health Officials Need to Learn From Each Other About Wastewater Surveillance
2020
- 21-Dec-20: How to communicate with students about COVID-19, according to science
- 12-May-20: Faculty receive WARF, Kellett, Romnes awards
- 24-Mar-20: Survey: Many still find it hard to stay home during pandemic, worry about mental health during isolation
- 20-Mar-20: Taking survey can help thwart COVID-19, spread Wisconsin Idea
- 6-Feb-20: Land-grant faculty prioritize public engagement, but feel isolated
2019
- 13-Nov-19: Americans maintain high levels of trust in science
- 31-Oct-19: NSF Grant Takes Scientific Approach to Public Engagement with Science
- 14-Jan-19: Study: “Post-normal” science requires unorthodox communication strategies
2018
- 7-Dec-18: Risk Analysis releases special issue on communicating about Zika virus
- 16-Oct-18: Public opinion on GMOs might impact similar technologies in stores
- 3-Oct-18: National Academy reports seen as beacons for civil public discourse
2017
- 23-Oct-17: Morgridge, UW scientists explore national security implications of gene editing
- 10-Aug-17: Attitudes on human genome editing vary, but all agree conversation is necessary
- 18-Feb-17: Communications expert advises how science should respond to fake news
- 14-Feb-17: Two from UW-Madison contribute to human gene editing report
2016
- 13-Dec-16: From public outreach to peer review, UW–Madison scientists find value in social media
- 18-Aug-16: UW experts contribute to NAS report on U.S. science literacy
- 13-May-16: Advisory: UW-Madison experts contribute to national GMO crops report
- 12-Apr-16: Can science communication be more scientific?
- 24-Mar-16: NAS panel takes stock of U.S. science literacy
- 24-Mar-16: Taking stock of U. S. science literacy broadly
- 23-Mar-16: Communicating Science: Battling Perceptions of a Knowledge Gap
2015
2014
- 6-Nov-14:Greater use of social media gets science, scientists noticed, study says
- 7-Jul-14: Mind the gap: Socioeconomic status may influence understanding of science
2013
- 8-Mar-13: Small differences in how a technology is defined can make a big difference in how the public feels about it
- 14-Feb-13: Trolls win: Rude blog comments dim the allure of science online
- 3-Jan-13: Researchers: Online science news needs careful study
2012
- 8-Nov-12: UW contingent among Kavli Frontiers of Science Fellows
- 21-May-12: Science communication under the microscope
- 10-Apr-12: Is media-driven “pseudo reality” the future of U.S. politics?
2011
- 5-May-11: In the battle against invasive aquatic species, Wisconsin bait shops are on the front line
2010
- 18-May-10: Web searches may sacrifice accuracy for popularity
- 31-Mar-10: On slippery science subjects, Internet news delivers
- 12-Jan-10: U.S. faces widening information gap on nanotechnology
2009
- 9-Sep-09: Science and media disconnect? Maybe not, says a new study
- 19-Jun-09: Scientists and public differ on views about nanotechnology regulation
2008
- 8-Dec-08: For nano, religion in U.S. dictates a wary view
- 10-Jul-08: Scientists see bright side of working with media
- 5-Jun-08: Scientific information largely ignored when forming opinions about stem cell research
2007
- 5-Dec-07: New book looks at public perception and media treatment of GMOs
- 26-Nov-07: Nanotech’s health, environment impacts worry scientists
- 1-May-07: Survey examines Americans’ trust in science
- 11-Jan-07: Split-screen debate coverage benefited Bush in 2004, research shows