2007 peer reviewed articles

Brossard, D. & Nisbet, M. C. (2007). Deference to scientific authority among a low information public: Understanding U.S. opinion on agricultural biotechnology. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(1), 24-52.

Brossard, D., & Shanahan J. (2007). Perspectives on communication about agricultural biotechnology. In D. Brossard, J. Shanahan, & T. C. Nesbit (Eds.),The public, the media, and agricultural biotechnology: An international casebook(pp. 3-20). Cambridge, MA: Oxford

Kleinman, D. L., Powell M., Grice, J., Adrian, J., & Lobes, C. ( 2007). A toolkit for democratizing science and technology policy: The practical mechanics of organizing a consensus conference. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 27(2), 154-169.

Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A. (2007). The future of public engagement [Cover article]. The Scientist, 21(10), 38-44.

Scheufele, D. A., Corley, E. A., Dunwoody, S., Shih, T., Hillback, E., & Guston, D. (2007). Scientists worry about some risks more than the public. Nature Nanotechnology, 2(12), 732 – 734.

Scheufele, D. A. (2007). Nano does not have a marketing problem … yet. Nano Today, 2(5), 48.

Scheufele, D. A. (2007). Opinion climates, spirals of silence, and biotechnology: Public opinion as a heuristic for scientific decision making. In D. Brossard, J. Shanahan, & T. C. Nesbit (Eds.), The public, the media, and agricultural biotechnology: An international casebook (pp. 231-241). Cambridge, MA: Oxford University Press/CABI.